Showing posts with label mobile payments. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mobile payments. Show all posts

Monday, September 8, 2014

Mobile payments have been boring so far. Here’s how to make them more interesting.

By Greg Blumstein, Managing Partner, Onyx Venture Advisors
September 8, 2014

Back in April I started writing a blog post that discussed the merits of Apple beginning to offer a mobile payments platform, the technology they have and could leverage towards providing such a service, and the new feature-set that it could bring about in payments. That article was over 13,000 words in its draft form, so I simply scrapped the article and never posted it. The most interesting part of that article, to me, was writing about what should be exciting in mobile payments, rather than the limited enhancement of replacing your plastic credit card with your phone.

After years of rumors, in the last week, additional rumors have started circulating that Apple will finally introduce its mobile payments solution in partnership with the major credit card payment networks, and include NFC in the upcoming iPhone 6, likely to be introduced tomorrow.

Below I briefly address two major points – Why Apple hasn’t launched a payment system until now, and what Apple and others could build into mobile payments and the payment networks of the future.

Why has Apple waited on introducing mobile payments?
While Apple is a global company, with roughly 60% of its revenue’s coming from outside the US, it still introduces most of its new products and services in the US first. At least part of the speculation has been that Apple was trying to get agreements in place with the major credit card networks, and perhaps some major retailers as well. Beyond that, to date, contact-less payments are not widely accepted in the US, whether you look at NFC, QR Codes (Passbook and others), WiFi or BLE (Bluetooth Low Energy, a.k.a, “iBeacons”).

That said, the US market is likely to start changing rapidly. Brick-and-mortar merchants in the US are going to be updating their Point-of-Sale (PoS) hardware to meet the October 2015 deadline to support EMV (“Chip-and-PIN” / “Chip-and-signature”). After the deadline, merchants who don’t support EMV will start being held liable for card-present fraud, when an EMV equipped card is present and processed.

Most of the major PoS hardware manufacturers seem to be including NFC as part of their newest PoS equipment that supports EMV, meaning NFC will finally start seeing wide deployment. You’ve likely already seen newer PoS hardware that supports EMV and NFC at some larger retailers such as pharmacy chains, which have already started rolling out new PoS equipment.

Replacing your plastic credit cards with your phone is boring. Here are some features that could make it more interesting.
Much of the aforementioned 13,000-word article revolved around how Apple could implement such features. That included discussions of Apple becoming a full-fledged payment network similar to American Express, Discover, MasterCard, and Visa, and the potential for Apple to also become a credit issuer similar to major credit card issuers, i.e., the banks (American Express, Bank of America, Chase, Citi, Discover, etc).

Many of the ideas below would be difficult, if not impossible, to implement if Apple just replaced your existing card with an iPhone, and continued to utilize the existing card networks’ limited legacy functionality. I hope Apple will do something more revolutionary than what Google has tried in the past with Google Wallet, or Coin is trying to do with its product for example.

Adopting the consumer standpoint, the benefits of not carrying around their existing plastic credit cards are fairly limited, especially if one can’t use your phone to pay 100% of the time. Therefore, more interesting features that could be enabled with both mobile payments and updated payment networks might include:
  • Real digital receipts. One-stop for all of your receipts perpetually, with much more information such as the exact items purchased, serial numbers, individual item prices, and real dates and times (instead of just a posting date). This would give you detailed information on each purchase instead of just a store name and total amount. Businesses could receive this information in real-time, imported directly into accounting software like QuickBooks for example, without having to recover receipts (paper or digital) from their employees. Imagine never receiving a paper receipt ever again, or giving out your email address for a digital receipt. [Square is rumored to be working on a product like this]
  • Location information. See the exact location on a map of the merchant for a transaction. Ever tried to remember what/where a purchase was made when it’s from a national chain, or a merchant name you don’t recognize? This feature will eliminate the doubt.
  • Zero fraud liability, including never needing to replace your expired, worn-out, lost, stolen, or hacked “credit card” or credit card number. See the recent examples of card information being stolen from Home Depot, TJ Max, Target, Adobe, Neiman Marcus, etc. Apple could leverage its “Secure Enclave” technology to provide a real solution to this, with one-time-use credit card numbers for every transaction, and/or per merchant, and for both web based transactions and in-store transactions. If your card number were stolen, it would be completely worthless and impossible to use at any other merchant. If your iPhone were stolen, no one could use it to purchase anything without your fingerprint via Touch ID.
  • No network / network offline transactions. Trying to pay at a parking meter with a cellular connection that’s slow or down at the moment? At a retailer and their credit card network connection is down? Using the Secure Enclave built into the iPhone, Apple could allow smaller transactions to be processed completely off-line, similar to a stored-value card. This could also replace other stored value cards such as transit cards.
  • Identifying the charging entity. On some multiple-card shared accounts (such as couples, with children, or business accounts) which person made the purchase is difficult to discern. With this feature, it would always be clear who and what device made the purchase.
  • Easy Card  (De)Activation. For businesses, the ability to instantly assign and revoke “cards” to employees on an as-needed basis, with real-time adjustable credit limits per employee. This could also apply to family members.
  • Streamlined functionality. One payment app, one process, and “Apple Simple”.

Adopting the merchant standpoint, additional enhancements should be created on that front as well:
  • Lower rates. Apple can undercut the existing payment networks by providing an in-house end-to-end system and still make a profit. Imagine saving 1%-2% per transaction vs. traditional credit cards. If the necessity of upgrading to newer POS terminals to support EMV and avoid the fraud-shift doesn’t do it, this would surely pay for the cost of new POS terminals in a short period of time. The savings are even more pronounced for card-not-present (web-based) transactions.
  • Lowered 3rd party fraud rates. Card-not-present (web based) fraud amounted to $282 Billion in losses in 2012 in the US. Using push alerts and TouchID, Apple could finally offer online merchants a 100% no-chargeback guarantee for stolen “credit cards”, even on non-physical/digital goods and services that aren’t shipped to a cardholders address. For card-present (brick and mortar) purchases, even with existing zero-fraud liabilities, Apple wouldn’t need any documentation (such as signed receipts) from the merchant to resolve a card-stolen situation as they’d have all of the data in-house including a digital “signature” from the iPhone (the users fingerprint) that authorized the transaction. Even EMV doesn’t solve this problem completely. As mentioned previously, Apple’s new system could also completely eliminate stolen physical credit cards and credit card numbers altogether.
  • Micropayments. To date there’s no great solution to micropayments for online merchants, due to high per-transaction fees for credit cards. If Apple owned the entire system (end-user account, network, merchant account), they could finally enable a financially viable solution that would work for micropayments online.
  • Better data. Traditional payment gateways (PayPal, Authorize.net, First Data, etc) and merchant account providers aren’t very good at giving merchants easily decipherable data on their transactions, especially when it comes to fees, disputes, and chargebacks. Square and Stripe are doing a better job at this, but at least in the case of Square, it’s questionable if they’re making money by offering one price transactions, without the typical and additional per-transaction fee. Apple could offer merchants even more data that provides insight into their customers’ habits and spending. This could open a can-of-worms from a privacy perspective, unless cardholders decided to opt-in, potentially for discounts from merchants. This would be similar to loyalty cards used at many retailers today that offer discounts.

While the above features are certainly difficult or even impossible to achieve today, they should be where Apple, other consumer-facing companies, and payment networks focus their attention, rather than replacing your piece of plastic with another form.

Thursday, December 12, 2013

The Surge of Mobile Wallets: Hype vs. Reality

by Michael Bershadski, Managing Partner at Onyx Venture Advisors
Dec. 12, 2013

Ever since the launch of the first iPhone in 2007, there has been a major shift in consumer behavior toward mobile media consumption, shopping and payments.  Mobile commerce is expected to surpass $86B by 2016 in the U.S. alone, according to eMarketer.  Our phones have already replaced our cameras, music players, web browsers, and navigation systems, so the idea that phones will soon replace our wallets is highly plausible.  

Considering that, I thought it would be interesting to put some of the recent announcements in this space into perspective.

After three years of testing and development, major U.S. carriers have finally rolled out Isis, a joint mobile payment initiative in November (available to AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon customers).  The Isis Mobile Wallet stores credit cards and loyalty programs and makes it possible for users to complete payments simply by waving their phone in front of the check out terminal.  The wallet takes advantage of near-field-communication (NFC) technology and is accepted at thousands of merchant locations nationwide.  However acceptance is far from ubiquitous, as majority of merchants are yet to upgrade existing point of sale (POS) systems to new contactless terminals.  Whether Isis succeeds or fails will be largely determined by widespread adoption of contactless terminals, ease of use and ultimately the carriers’ ability to convince mainstream users of its value and benefits. 

Google, which first piloted an NFC mobile wallet back in 2011, has recently issued a physical debit card that allows users to withdraw funds from their Google Wallet account in an attempt to broaden its reach and bridge the gap with legacy POS systems. Despite being one of the early proponents of NFC in the U.S., Google Wallet has struggled to gain meaningful traction with consumers, and its tap-and-pay feature has been hindered by the carriers, who have all but blocked it from their networks in favor of their own proprietary wallet, Isis (Sprint is the sole U.S. carrier supporting Google Wallet and is not part of the Isis consortium).

Meanwhile, a new startup called Coin announced plans to develop a programmable card that can store multiple credit cards, debit cards, and loyalty accounts and has a new kind of magnetic strip capable of replicating any stored account at the press of a button, allthewhile maintaining physical dimensions of a traditional card (i.e. compatible with existing magnetic swipe terminals). Coin appears to have taken a clue from Google Wallet by developing a proprietary device that is outside of the carriers’ reach and is compatible with legacy POS systems.  However, Coin has yet to face card issuers, payment networks, and financial regulators as it attempts to process and store sensitive payment information.    

While financial institutions have for the most part embraced mobile banking, there is a general sense of unease surrounding POS transactions.  This is primarily driven by the financial sector’s reluctance to share a slice of transaction fees with contenders and desire to protect current merchant discount rates.  That said, the battle is not only over merchant fees, another contentious issue is the data associated with financial transactions.  This is arguably the real reason why Internet giants such as Google have a vested interest in mobile payments.  After all, whoever owns transaction data holds the keys to a treasure trove of consumer behavior information (when and where they shop, what they purchase) and is in a position to influence future purchasing decisions by serving more targeted and timely ads, deals, and offers.

Technology has the power to disrupt industries and to change the power dynamics among the key players.  Publishing and music industries are but two recent examples.  As new mobile payment mechanisms evolve in the form of mobile wallets, smart cards, and (someday soon) wearable devices, they may well threaten financial institutions’ grip on merchant fees and transaction data.  While the financial sector is highly regulated and the underlying payment networks so far remain largely unchanged, the world is changing.  Those that adopt short-term defensive strategies will face long-term risk of being left on the sidelines, disintermediated and ultimately not in control of the customer interface.











.